Do Well By Doing Good. Nonprofit Service A Key Part Of Your Resume

imagesAnything that helps get more women into the C-suite in organizations is very welcome. It matters who makes decisions at the top of organizations and governments, and at the moment the decision-making of the old vanguard is not inspiring a lot of confidence.

One way you can position yourself more favorably as a new hire, or for a promotion to a more senior job, is to sit on a nonprofit board. The caveat is that this is only likely to be helpful if you chair the Board or a significant committee in a large well-known non-profit organization. To get to this position you obviously need to start lower down and work your way up.

In an interview for Fast Company, Harold (Terry) McGraw , Chairman, President and CEO of the McGraw-Hill Companies encourages any executive looking for a job with him to get nonprofit board experience. “If I don’t see that (board experience),” he says, “I’m discouraged about the candidate. I want to see how complete a person is. Board participation tells me a lot about someone’s interest and experience…”

Many companies now have corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a key part of their strategy. If you can demonstrate your interests and values by serving on a nonprofit board, you will not only contribute valuable service to your local community, you might also position yourself more favorably for career promotion. In effect, do well by doing good.


Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When Patience Is Not A Virtue

PatienceThe International Olympic Committee (IOC) has made gender equality an express goal of their organization. The percentage of women athletes at this year’s Winter Games in Vancouver was around 40 percent, up from roughly 25 percent in the early 1990’s. Nevertheless, women ski jumpers failed in their attempt at inclusion in the 2010 event and were roundly criticized by the IOC for taking them to court over it.

Jacques Rogge, Chief Executive of the Olympic Committee, said: “The IOC, in a very predictable human reaction, might say: ‘Oh, yeah, I remember them. They’re the ones that embarrassed us and caused us a lot of trouble in Vancouver. Maybe they should wait another four years or eight years.”

Given that Mr Rogge’s powerful executive board consists of 14 men and one token woman, it’s obvious that the espoused goal of gender equality hasn’t quite reached the top of the IOC where all of the important decisions are made.

Women ski jumpers are told they must be patient. It’s the same advice women leaders have heard for some time – just be patient (read less pushy) and gradually your time will come and will see more women in positions of senior leadership.

Unfortunately the facts do not support the myth that it’s only a matter of patience and time before women join men at the top of organizations. In the European Union 9.7 percent of the board members at the top 300 companies were women in 2008. In the United States and Canada, roughly 13 -15 percent of the board members of the Fortune 500 and the Financial Post 500 companies are women. In China and India, women hold roughly 5 percent of board seats, in Japan, just 1.4 percent. The numbers are just as low when we look at corporate officer positions.

These numbers are creeping up very slowly and in some countries like the USA and Canada, they are even stalling. If women are patient and wait their turn we might only have to wait another 70 years or so before we see more balanced leadership at the top of organizations.

In my opinion, being patient and waiting our turn is the last thing women need to do. The women ski jumpers know they haven’t got time to wait – by the time Mr Rogge and his predominantly male committee get over their petulant response to their push for equal opportunity at the winter games, some of them might be past their peak to compete.

Similarly, women leaders shouldn’t be fooled by the myth that if they patiently wait their turn, we will someday soon have equal numbers of women at the top of organizations. Under these circumstances, patience is not advise and is definitely not a virtue!

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why women don’t make it up the career ladder

woman climbing ladderA new study from Bain & Company offers explanations for why women disappear before reaching the top of organizations.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Top Companies for Leadership Have More Women Senior Leaders

22427532We all know, simply from the low numbers of women in positions of senior leadership in organizations, that it’s generally more difficult for women to succeed to the top of organizations. This week, Hay Group, a global management consulting firm, and Bloomberg BusinessWeek.com released the Best Companies for Leadership Study and Top 20 list. There were some interesting key findings:

  1. 94 percent of respondents in the Top 20 actively manage a pool of successors for mission critical roles, compared with 69 percent of all respondents
  2. 80 percent of respondents in the Top 20 noted that people stay at the organization primarily for growth opportunities, compared with 61 percent of all respondents
  3. 95 percent of respondents in the Top 20 use corporate social responsibility to recruit employees, compared with 60 percent of all respondents
  4. 66 percent of respondents in the Top 20 have a high proportion of women in senior leadership, compared with 37 percent of all respondents
  5. 91 percent of respondents in the Top 20 make it easy for people to work from home, compared with 46 percent of all respondents
  6. 87 percent of respondents in the Top 20 have a sufficient number of internal candidates ready to assume open leadership positions, compared with 54 percent of all respondents

If you are a woman who aspires to lead it makes sense to conduct due diligence on your organization and to assess whether or not the organizational and leadership culture supports your aspirations. In other words, is there any chance of you making it around here?

If we look at some of the key findings above, it would be wise to ask yourself the following questions.

Does my company:

  • Have an identified talent pool of successors for key leadership roles and, if it does, are there at least 30% women in that pool?
  • Provide opportunities for me to grow as a leader and, if so, am I taking advantage of them?
  • Have three or more women on the board and on the senior leadership team?
  • Enable women to stay on the leadership track by allowing them to work from home when needed?

If you ask questions about how serious your organization is about enabling women to succeed to senior positions, you should be able to assess whether or not it’s the right place for you to work. This is an important step in your career planning. Why make it even more difficult to succeed by working in an organization that doesn’t recognize the obstacles that women face in their journey to senior management and at least try to help overcome them?

Women often think that if they simply do a great job they will get promoted. But it usually requires more than this. It’s important to take control of your career, rather than simply react and respond to opportunities and setbacks that come your way. A first step towards this is to ensure that you are in an organization that wants more women leaders and is taking positive action to support this.

For a more detailed look at how and why to conduct due diligence on yourself and on your organization, see chapter four of t Unwritten Rules: What Women Need To Know About Leading In Today’s Organizations.


Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Montreal Book Launch at Cafe Holt

LYN1_0003_256Lots of friends gathered on January 27 at the stylish Cafe Holt to celebrate Women Leaders and the official launch of Unwritten Rules – The Book. A fabulous evening. Through book sales we raised over $300 for Women for Women International. See some great photos – view album.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Davos Annual Meeting 2010 – The Gender Agenda: Putting Parity into Practice

 

Davos 2010 Gender Agenda

Davos 2010 Gender Agenda

Watch this one-hour debate on gender parity at the 2010 Davos meeting which discusses many of the themes covered in section one of Unwritten Rules.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Women Don’t Ask

question-mark-med-20305754Shaun Rein, the young, male, managing director of the China Market Research Group, offered his views this week on Forbes.com about “Why Men Don’t Promote Women More.”

He writes:

 

“In my career, I have tended to promote more men than women. I have even generally given men higher salaries. Why? Am I sexist? Do men do a better job? The answer is a resounding no to both. Actually, it is mostly women’s fault. They simply don’t ask for raises or promotions as often as men do.

He received quite a backlash from many female readers for the somewhat naive and simplistic presentation of his views – but of course, he does have a point.

It is often said that women don’t achieve top jobs or top salaries because they expect to be recognized for their merits without promoting themselves and without being clear about what they want. In my experience of coaching both men and women in organizations, this stereotype is largely true — men are generally much better at asking for what they want and surprise, surprise, then go on to get it more often than women.

Avoiding negotiation and self-promotion is a reality for women that certainly hinder their progress, but is is hardly surprising behavior given the gender stereotypes ingrained in our society. If women act on advice to become more assertive and actively promote themselves, they are likely to be judged  (by both men and women) as too pushy or too tough.

Explicit messages such as “nice girls don’t ask”, “I want doesn’t get,” and being labeled “pushy” when they do say what they want, reinforces the implicit messages women grow up with: it is unattractive and unfeminine to push themselves forward in this way.

It makes sense that women aren’t good at self-promotion or stating what they want, because these are assertive behaviors that are accepted and rewarded in men and often rejected and disliked in women. Women are faced with a tough choice — say what they want and be disliked for being self-promoting and pushy; or conform to social stereotypes and limit themselves to middle management jobs where they often get paid less than their male counterparts.

Most respondents to Shaun Rein’s blog in Forbes.com didn’t like what he had to say about women being their own worst enemies when it comes to getting promotions and higher pay. I think he was simply asking the wrong question.

It’s not about whether or not women reduce their chances of climbing the corporate ladder because they don’t ask for what they want. In my experience of over twenty-five years in organizations, I have certainly observed this to be true and, at the same time, perfectly understandable.


The more interesting and revealing question is why do we continue to reward men who assert what they want and penalize women who demonstrate the same behavior? If he asked and answered that question we would be more interested in what he had to say.


Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hair, Hemlines and Husbands

When women are in, or run for, senior leadership positions they are often hampered by negative media treatment. Evidence shows the press to be more interested in their appearance or who they are married to, rather than their leadership capabilities and accomplishments.

In her autobiography, Carly Fiorina (CEO Hewlett Packard 1999 – 2005), said:

“When I finally reached the top, after striving my entire career to be judged by results and accomplishments, the coverage of my gender, my appearance and the perceptions of my personality would vastly outweigh anything else… It is undeniable that the words spoken and written about me made my life and my job infinitely more difficult.”

In her 2008 bid for the United States Democratic presidential nomination, Hilary Clinton faced very different media treatment from Barack Obama, her male Democratic rival. Reports claimed that she was only there because of her husband, that she was inauthentic and manipulative when she nearly cried in New Hampshire, and she was trying too hard to be the smartest girl in the room when she demonstrated her extensive grasp of issues.

In 1998 The White House Project, a U.S., nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization, to advance women’s leadership up to the U.S. Presidency, was so concerned by press obsession with the personal aspects of women, they conducted a media study of women running for governor or attorney general in five U.S. States. The results came to be known as the “hair, hemlines, and husbands” research. When they analyzed press clips from six campaigns (311 newspaper stories, including 891 candidate quotes) they found that:

  • Journalists were more likely to focus on the personal characteristics of female candidates.
  • Women journalists reported on personal aspects for both women and men.
  • Male journalists more frequently covered the age and marital and family status (most significantly the presence or absence of children) of female candidates.
  • Reporters were more likely to highlight male candidates’ positions and records on the issues and were more likely to quote male candidates’ reasoning behind their claims.

Intentional or otherwise, media coverage of female leaders often erodes their authority and credibility by focusing on aspects superficial to the key issues. If we want the benefits of more women leaders in government and organizations it’s time to expose the insidious influence of this type of media coverage.

And so when you next see a female leader get the hair, hemlines and husband treatment, notice your own reaction – do you collude by joining the attack? Or do you expose it for what it is – biased media coverage that makes it even harder for women to lead from the top.


Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sarkozy Wants More Women

0t8e43xu3jz3j43xFollowing Norway’s successful imposition of a minimum 40% women on corporate boards, Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France, centre-right party has mounted an attack on the male dominated bastion of the French corporate world.
A bill just submitted to the French parliament proposes all companies listed on the French stock exchange must have 50% women on their boards by 2015.The proposal will be debated in January 2010 and will need the approval of both houses of parliament to become law.

Many, not just in France, see quotas for women on corporate boards as a “necessary evil” if we are to gain the benefits of more women leading organizations. Advocates of gender parity in the boardroom would, of course, rather see women recruited on their merit. But the entrenched old boys networks make this unlikely to happen any time soon. Which is why those who have traditionally opposed the legislative route are grudgingly changing their stance.

President of the conservative French Institute of directors, Daniel Lebegue, said they had reluctantly decided that quotas were the only way of encouraging progress. Veronique Preaux-Cobti, a renowned French business woman, told Le Figaro that “after years of good will with no change, there is a real realization that things are not going to change on their own.”

It’s easy to be cynical about Sarkozy’s bold move. After appointing seven women to his 15-member cabinet in 2007 he has since replaced three of these women with men. And at the last election only 18% of MP’s in the lower house were women. Perhaps he should get his own house in order before proposing legislation that will radically impact the French corporate world.

I prefer to take a more positive, optimistic approach and I applaud Sarkozy and his party for confronting the French male corporate elite. Bon chance Nicolas!

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It’s Not A Male Conspiracy

Every month or so new research appears about women in senior leadership – either there aren’t enough of them, or they’re not being treated on a par with men when they do make it to the top.

Two of the most recent examples are the World Economic Forum’s 2009 Gender Gap Report, and a new survey from The Corporate Library on the relative earnings of female CEOs.

The Gender Gap report gives a league table of how well countries use their resource of female talent (predictably, not very well for most countries). The Corporate Library survey reveals that female CEOs (those rare creatures) earn just 58 percent of what males earn; they also get lower bonuses.

One might surmise  (as some women do when they read these kind of statistics), that there’s some kind of male conspiracy to keep women out of boardrooms and corner offices.

I don’t believe that’s so.

Men don’t get up in the morning and think, “How can I keep women down today?” At least not any men I know. Most of them just aren’t very interested in the issue. They’re focused on climbing the corporate ladder, and don’t really think gender gaps at the top are that important.

So, if it’s not a male conspiracy, why ARE there relatively few women in the upper echelons?

It’s tempting to look for single causes: women have lower self-esteem, or women are not genetically programmed to lead, or men are more committed and ambitious for power – the list goes on and on.

In fact, media articles that quote new research almost always focus on a single cause for the lack of women at the top.  After all, if there were a single reason why more women don’t influence government policy, run academic institutions or lead corporations, it would be relatively easy to assign blame and fix the problem.

Unfortunately, for complex issues such as this one, there is never a single point of causality.

Simplistic analyses that say women need to be more assertive, more confident or more ambitious, are well intentioned, but misleading. They result in confusing advice for women who want to lead.

Women are told, for example, that they need to be more assertive, but not so assertive that they are disliked; they need to be collaborative, but not so friendly that they lack credibility; they need to be more competent than their male colleagues, but in a way that does not threaten them; and they need to be role models for other women, but need to behave more like men to succeed. Women obviously also need a good sense of humor!

Instead of looking for a single cause, we need to look at the different forces that interact to create leadership and organizational norms that favor men and disadvantage women. I call these forces the “unwritten rules.”

These rules aren’t explicitly acknowledged in organizations, but we all know they exist. They create a culture or environment in which it is more difficult for women to get to the top, and even to stay there once they have succeeded.

The unwritten rules are not part of some dastardly male conspiracy to keep women down. Rather, they are leadership norms that have evolved and become more extreme over time. Unfortunately, they are so firmly entrenched in organizations that they show little signs of changing.

What can be done to change this unbalanced status quo?

There seems to be a growing movement that recognizes women as a vastly underutilized leadership resource that could lead us back to economic stability, and clean up some of the dubious business practices that have led to the current worldwide economic recession.

Saadia Zahidi, co-author of the 2009 Global Gender Gap Report, says “Women and girls make up one half of the human resources available to the world and it will be imperative that they are educated, empowered and integrated for rapid economic recovery.”

The Corporate Library survey of Female CEO Pay demonstrates the need for parity at the top, even after women have made it to the corner office.

This is unlikely to happen, however, unless we move away from conspiracy theories and singular causes.

Instead, we need to confront the reality of the unwritten rules, and recognize how they produce leadership behavior that maintains a status quo that significantly disadvantages women who want to lead. Women then have a clear choice. Learn the skills to succeed within the rules; or expose the rules and try to change the game.

Lynn Harris

Originally posted at http://www.amazingwomenrock.com/1028-unwritten-rules-keep-women-from-plum-corporate-posts.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment